🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action is a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to decide in the coming days on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, including seizing EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has previously noted it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."